Let's compare Nissan Tekton Visia T160 vs Mahindra Thar AXT RWD Diesel

Compare Nissan Tekton Visia T160 vs Mahindra Thar AXT RWD Diesel price, specifications, mileage, features and performance to find the best car for you.

Nissan Tekton Visia T160
Nissan Tekton
Mahindra Thar AXT RWD Diesel
Mahindra Thar
Car comparison placeholder
Car comparison placeholder
Here is a detailed comparison of price:

Nissan Tekton Visia T160

Price

₹ 11.97 Lakh

On-Road Price New Delhi

EMI

₹ 21,892/month

Mahindra Thar AXT RWD Diesel

Price

₹ 11.26 Lakh

On-Road Price New Delhi

EMI

₹ 20,594/month

From the above comparison, we can conclude that Mahindra Thar feels light on the pocket compared to Nissan Tekton by ₹70,931.

Dimensions & Seating

Body Type

Suv

Suv

Length

4349 mm +364

3985 mm

Width

1815 mm

1820 mm +5

Height

1659 mm

1850 mm +191

WheelBase

2657 mm +207

2450 mm

Ground Clearance

212 mm

226 mm +14

Seating Capacity

5 +1

4

Fuel Tank Capacity

50 Liters

57 Liters +7

Boot Space

518 Liters

-- Liters

Engine & Transmission

Fuel Type

Petrol

Diesel

Mileage (KMPL)

19.4 +4.2

15.2 Km/l

Range

970 Kms +104

866 Kms

Engine Type

T160 Mpfi Turbo

D117 Crde

Powertrain Assistance

No

No

Emission Standards

Bs Vi

Bs Vi

No. of Cylinders

3

4 +1

Displacement

999 cc

1497 cc +498

Max Power

99 bhp @ 5000 rpm

117 bhp @ 3500 rpm +18

Max Torque

166 Nm @ 2000-3750 rpm

300 Nm @ 1750-2500 rpm +134

Transmission Type

MT

MT

Gear Box

6-SPeed

6-MT

Drive Type

FWD

RWD

Top Speed

175 +20

155

Steering and Suspension

Tilt Adjust

Yes

Yes

Telescopic Adjust

Yes

--

Turning Radius

5.2

5.5 +0.3

Front Suspension

MacPherson Strut

Independent Double Wishbone

Rear Suspension

Semi-rigid Axle

Multilink solid Rear Axle

Front Brakes

Disc

Disc

Rear Brakes

Drum

Drum

Safety & Security

Airbags

6 +4

2

Seatbelt Warning

Yes

Yes

Over Speeding Warning

Yes

Yes

Anti-lock Braking System

Yes

Yes

ESP

Yes

Yes

Brake Assist

Yes

Yes

Tyre Pressure Monitor System

Yes

No

Reverse Camera

No

No

360 Camera

No

No

Hill Assist

Yes

Yes

Hill Descent Control

No

Yes

Child Lock

Yes

Yes

Isofix Child Seat Mount

Yes

Yes

Engine Immobilizer

Yes

--

ADAS

No

No

Comfort & Convenience

Power Windows

Front And Rear

Only Front

ORVM Adjustment

Electric

Manual

Request Sensors

--

--

Push Button Start

No

No

Cruise Control

No

No

Keyless Entry

--

--

Steering Mounted Control

--

--

Climate Control

--

--

Rear AC Vents

Yes

No

Adjustable Steering Column

Yes

Yes

Interior Features

Upholstery

Fabric

Fabric

Adjustable Front Seats

Yes

Yes

Height Adjustable Driver Seat

Yes

Yes

Rear Armrest

No

Yes

Rear Cup Holders

--

--

Front Cup Holders

Yes

Yes

Cooled Glovebox

No

No

Exterior Features

Sunroof

No

Not Compatible

Wheels

Steel Rims

Steel Rims

Fog Lights

No

No

Tyre Size

225 / 60 R17

245 / 75 R16

Daytime Running Lights

LED

--

Headlight Type

Reflector Led

Halogen

Tailgate

Electric

Manual

Roof Rails

No

No

Rear Wiper

No

No

Infotainment & Telematics

Touch Screen

Yes

--

Screen Size

--

--

USB Port

Yes

Yes

Navigation System

No

No

Speakers

4

--

Remote App Control

No

No

Wireless Charging

No

No

Smartphone Connectivity

No

No

Telematics

Digital

Analogue-Digital

Connectivity & Internet

USB Port

Yes

Yes

Navigation

No

No

Smartphone Connectivity

No

No

Nissan Tekton Vs Mahindra Thar Colors
Nissan Tekton Onyx Black

Onyx Black

Mahindra Thar STEALTH BLACK

STEALTH BLACK

Nissan Tekton Onyx Black

Onyx Black

Mahindra Thar STEALTH BLACK

STEALTH BLACK

Nissan Tekton Vs Mahindra Thar Expert Opinions
Design and Aesthetics
Features and Specifications
After Sales Support
Brand Value
Resale Value
Likes
Dislikes
Design and Aesthetics
Features and Specifications
After Sales Support
Brand Value
Resale Value
Likes
Dislikes
Nissan Tekton Vs Mahindra Thar FAQs

Yes, the Nissan Tekton is positioned as the spiritual and spiritual successor to the popular Nissan Terrano in India, marking a major update for the brand in the mid-size SUV category.

Yes, both the Nissan Tekton and the Renault Duster share the same highly modular CMF-B platform developed under the global Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance.

The Nissan Tekton made its official market debut in July 2026, with bookings opening across dealerships shortly after its global reveal.

The Tekton offers an all-turbocharged petrol lineup, featuring a 1.0-litre three-cylinder Turbo T160 engine and a more powerful 1.3-litre four-cylinder Turbo T280 engine.

The engines were developed jointly under the Renault-Nissan alliance, with the higher-spec 1.3-litre T280 turbo-petrol unit being co-developed in a specialized partnership with Daimler.

Yes, the premium 1.3-litre Turbo T280 engine can be configured with either a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed wet-clutch dual-clutch transmission (DCT).

The SUV competes directly in the mid-size segment against rivals like the Hyundai Creta, Kia Seltos, Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara, and Tata Sierra.

While they share structural architecture, the Tekton features an upmarket, urban theme using premium tri-tone upholstery in beige and burgundy shades alongside rose gold accents.

Yes, the higher variants of the SUV come equipped with a comprehensive Level 2 ADAS suite alongside safety features like six airbags and a 360-degree camera.

The 3-door Mahindra Thar was launched in October 2020, and it remains in production. It has become one of the most iconic off-road SUVs in India, combining retro style with modern tech.

The Thar is built on a ladder-frame / body-on-frame chassis, not a monocoque. That means a separate rigid frame under the vehicle supports the body. This style gives it strength and toughness — excellent for off-road use, rugged terrain, uneven surfaces. The flip side? It tends to have more body roll, slightly less smooth ride at highway speeds compared to crossover SUVs, and more weight. But if your road includes broken stretches, streams, mud, or even adventure trails, ladder frame is gold.

Thar has many things working in its favor. First, its looks: round headlamps, seven-slot grille, boxy rugged shape — retro but cool. Second, it taps into nostalgia: Mahindra’s lineage of Jeeps (CJ, MM540) is legendary. Third, it offers real off-road capability in a licensed SUV package (4×4, high ground clearance, robust chassis) at prices many can reach. Fourth, media, film and owner stories have made the Thar more than a car, it’s identity, rebel car, adventure car. It’s that vehicle people imagine driving through desert dunes, forest trails, or Chennai monsoon roads and living to tell about it.

The first generation Thar (launched around 2010) grew out of Mahindra’s legacy of producing rugged “jeep-like” vehicles (e.g. MM540). The old Thar had simpler features: basic interiors, fewer comfort features, analogue dials, basic doors or soft tops. The current 2020 Thar upgrades a lot: modern suspension (independent front double wishbone, multi-link rear with coil springs instead of older leaf/composite springs), better ride comfort, features like touchscreen infotainment, LED lighting, safety equipment, more variants (petrol/diesel, manual/auto), removable tops (hard top, soft top, convertible style). So the Thar evolved from rugged utilitarian off-roader to “rugged + somewhat civilized” adventure SUV.

MM540 was one of the ancestors of Thar. Mahindra produced the MM540 from around 1985 to 2005 (varied by model), which itself was an evolution of Mahindra’s Jeep licence lineage (CJ, etc.). MM540 was very basic, almost military/off-road focused: leaf springs, minimal creature comforts, rugged and simple. Thar inherits that DNA: it’s part nostalgia, part engineering. But modern Thar is far more than just MM540 with a stereo.

Yes, design conflict has been a thing. Jeep’s parent companies (Stellantis / FCA) have alleged that Mahindra’s Thar too closely resembles the Jeep Wrangler or Jeep’s design trademarks — things like the front grille, bumper style, small design cues. In some markets (Australia among them), Jeep has taken Mahindra to court arguing that Mahindra is infringing intellectual property rights. Mahindra has responded sometimes by saying no immediate plan to launch in those markets, or has removed teaser images, etc. So there is legal tension. Thar is iconic, but because certain design cues are globally recognized, copying or resembling too closely invites trouble.

Because of its look, its roar, and how it is often used. Thar has appeared in films, in crime-stories, in rural strongman legends, in city stories as “that SUV that can drive anywhere”. Some people believe owning a Thar projects power: seeing it drive up means attrition of smaller cars, road space, etc. In some regions, Thar owners have been associated with overconfidence, performing reckless driving. Media reports of accidents or misbehaviour sometimes focus on Thar drivers. So it has “notorious” status in popular culture — partly romantic, partly real, partly exaggerated.

Should buy if you value off-road capability, want a car that can take mud, water, and rough terrain, like adventure weekends, beach drives, or need to go to remote areas. If you want strong road presence and don’t mind compromises on comfort, fuel cost, space. Also good for enthusiasts, younger people who want a fun weekend ride more than a plush city drive. Avoid if your drive is mostly smooth city roads, frequent traffic jams, parking tight, you want high fuel efficiency, or comfort as priority over ruggedness. If your back complains easily, Thar’s ride can be firm.

Thar got 4 stars for adult and child occupant protection in the 2020 Global NCAP test, when tested in basic spec with two airbags. The updated Thar Roxx version has gone further, earning 5 stars in both adult and child safety in Bharat NCAP. This shows Mahindra has worked to improve safety with stronger structure and more safety tech.

Because Thar is tall, high clearance, and body-on-frame, it has a higher centre of gravity than many other SUVs. That increases risk in sharp turns or fast evasive manoeuvres. However, standard driving, responsible speeds, avoiding overloading, and features like ESC reduce that risk significantly. Official crash tests noted “unstable dynamic behaviour” in some scenarios, so driver caution is required. There is no large public record (in tests) of design being proven unsafe in normal conditions.